Pacers: The Science Behind the Ultra Luxury

Before I ever ran my first 100-mile race, I a good friend invited me to crew and pace her at the 2017 Western States 100. Another friend would help her cover miles 62-80 and then I would accompany her from there to the finish, a team with one mission: get her to the finish strong. The use of pacers is a uniquely North American ultramarathon luxury, and their use is a little contentious. This does mean there are strict rules around pacer use, and unlike in a supported run amongst friends or a Fastest Known Time attempt, pacers in the majority of ultras (excluding the Leadville Trail 100 Mile where pacers are allowed to physically mule the supplies of their runner) are simply there for accompaniment and safety of the runner.

Corrine with a pacer at Western States 100

The author (center) runs with a pacer at the 2019 Western States 100. Photo: Thomas Malcolm

However, any pacer worth their salt knows the job of navigating a runner’s emotional needs and psychological state in the back half of a long race can have a profoundly positive impact on a racer’s day. So while they can’t physically mule for you, good emotional muling can pull the very best out of you – physically and psychologically. While no research I’m aware of has been done on the effect of pacers on ultramarathon performance, we can turn to the literature on pace setters in track and marathon running, as well as the strategic use of teammates in multiple sports to explore the physiological and psychological benefit of working with a planned pacer or simply working together with other runners.

Does Pacing Offer Physiological Benefits?

Enter the sub-two-hour marathon project, a racing event contrived to set up a small group of athletes with all possible advantages in hopes that one of them can break a time thought to be impossible.  True to form, physiology researchers set out to quantify anything and everything possible to increase performance required for running under the two-hour mark . When you are trying to run a time 2.5% faster than the world record, and you have extensive sponsor support devoted to the cause, you pick apart every component that may reduce the metabolic cost of running. This includes obvious characters like shoe technology, leg swing, and favorable meteorological conditions, but it also includes less conventional things like employing a cooperative drafting strategy. Drafting strategies usually employ a handful of runners, often set up in a chevron, at the front of a group of performers to “break the wind” easing the effort of those behind them. Another cooperative drafting strategy is to do the same thing with a group of racers: each takes a turn aiding the others by running at the front. These strategies are harder to implement outside a controlled lab setting but in an ideal scenario, if a runner could draft completely behind another runner the metabolic cost of running could be reduced by 5.9% (1). That’s a huge benefit if executed correctly.

If you’ve watched well known road marathons, you’ll notice that pacers are often employed early in the race and when they fall off the pace the lead runners are left on their own to fight to the finish. But more critically, if you look closer, you’ll notice the elite runners are often not running in a position that benefits from drafting, and instead often run in between the pacers or even at their shoulder. So if they are not benefiting from the reduction in metabolic cost why have pacers? Enter emotional muling, and the incredibly interesting psychological benefits of utilizing pacers. 

Pacers Lighten the Psychological Load 

If you remember back to our article on the science of self-efficacy, and the belief in one’s abilities to achieve goals and tasks, you might remember that seeing others complete a goal can build strength in your own belief that you too can complete it (2). Pacers in that sense are the in-race reminder of, “Hey, you got this!” This allows pacers to serve a dual psychological purpose, specifically reducing the mental effort required to both set and monitor a difficult to maintain pace (3). We also see this in grand tour cycling competitions where teams utilize multiple riders to help and protect their top contender in the overall standings through long climbing stages. While this is partially beneficial due to drafting, they have also found that having a teammate lead you on a climb shifts your focus from internal sensory monitoring to external elements which can distract you from perceiving the effort as more difficult (4). Essentially, you stay more in the moment instead of trapped in your own head, wading through discomfort alone. The same is seen in 1,600-meter runners utilizing a pacesetter on the track, where although performance outcomes didn’t change, when asked, the runners thought they had run faster and felt the effort was easier when running with a pacesetter than while running solo (2).

Mike Acer Western States with pacer

Mike Acer finishes the 2021 Western States 100 with the support of his pacer and crew. Photo: iRunFar

Working Together Helps Everyone

What if you don’t have a pacer or a teammate to be your psychological tugboat? 

Have you ever felt like suffering through a long run or workout is a whole lot easier with friends? There’s a reason for that. It turns out working hard with others, be it competitors or teammates, both elevates your pain threshold (5) and modulates your affective feelings (how much pleasure or displeasure it brings) (6). 

In a study utilizing University of Oxford rowers, researchers found that when athletes performed ergometer workouts together rather than alone, they displayed an increased pain threshold post-workout (5). You might think they were just putting on a good face for their teammates, and if the pain-threshold component had been tested in view of one another, maybe that would  factor in. However, these data points were collected privately approximately five minutes after the end of the workout by inflating blood-pressure cuffs on the athletes’ arms. This effect is owed to something called behavioral synchrony, or coordinated collective action, which results in greater endogenous opioid production (the endorphins and natural pain killers your body produces) than can be produced during solo exercise.

A more recent study conducted with runners in two 10-kilometer time trials highlighted similar results (6). Perhaps not surprisingly, the group of runners ran faster during their group time trial than during their solo efforts, averaging a time of 39:32 together versus 40:28 solo. So what accounts for this increase in performance outside of the obvious push of a competitor? During the study, researchers recorded rate of perceived exertion (RPE), pace, and affective feeling  (a point scale of displeasure/negative versus please/positive towards the effort, -5 to +5) each lap. What they found, was even though the runners were running faster during the group time trial the linear RPE progression over the course of the 10k were virtually identical to the solo efforts. Additionally, the pacing strategy played out the exact same in both 10ks, with a fast start, a slower middle, and an acceleration to the end. So the piece of data that stands out suddenly is how the runners felt emotionally over the course of the time trial (negative versus positive affective feelings). A distinct pattern appeared in which the solo time trial runners experienced increasingly negative feelings as the 10k progressed while during the group time trial the runners emotional state remained relatively stable over the entirety of the run (6). This means that even though both runs were hard (similar RPE response), the group time trial felt good by comparison.

We should note that this response still varies amongst individuals and is highlighted by the fact that all 14 of the runners finished the solo time trial while three of the runners dropped out of the group time trial. These runners dropped out not because their perceived exertion was too high (it was the same as their solo effort) but their affective feelings/emotional states were three to five points more negative than expected for a group effort. The run didn’t feel harder, but the negative feelings about the run ultimately won out.

Ragna Debats western states

Ragna Debats runs with a pacer during the 2021 Western States 100. Photo: iRunFar

The Takeaways on Pacers

So how can we utilize this information in trail running and ultrarunning?

  • Be a positive pacer. While you can’t physically carry anything for your runner, being an emotional mule for your runner is possible. Strengthen your runner’s self-efficacy with reinsuring comments, lead by example (put on a good face), and do as the pro road cycling teams do and be the external leader they need instead of the internal voice.
  • Make new teammates in the race. We can line up as competitors, or we can align as teammates. Working with those around you in the race to lighten exertion might be the biggest advantage you can give yourself. 
  • It can be difficult without being bad. There’s a quote from Dan Millman’s book Way of the Peaceful Warrior that has stuck with me since high school. “Pain is a relatively objective, physical phenomenon; suffering is our psychological resistance to what happens. Events may create physical pain, but they do not in themselves create suffering. Resistance creates suffering.” Akin to what they found in the 10k group time trial study, things can be difficult without feeling bad and challenges are generally easier when you are working alongside others. Given the variability amongst individuals, it’s likely you can practice this to reap the benefits both with others and on your own.

Call for Comments

  • Have you ever used a pacer? Do you feel it benefitted your performance?
  • What are you thoughts on the use of pacers being a specifically North American racing luxury?

References

  1. Hoogkamer W., Kram R., Arellano CJ., 2017. How Biomechanical Improvements in Running Economy Could Break the 2-hour Marathon Barrier. Sports Med. 2017 March. doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0708-0
  2. Fullerton CL., Andrew ML., Devonport TJ., 2017. The Influence of a Pacesetter on Psychological and Pacing Behavior during a 1600m Run. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 16: 551-557.
  3. Renfree, A., Crivoi do Carmo, E., Martin, L., Peters, D.M., 2015. The influence of collective behaviour on pacing in endurance competitions. Frontiers in Physiology 6, 373.
  4. Ouvrard T., Groslambert A., Ravier G., Grospretre S., Gimenez P., Grappe F., 2018. Mechanisms of Performance Improvements Due to a Leading Teammate During Uphill Cycling. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Apr 13:1-25. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0878. 
  5. Cohen EEA., Ejsmond-Frey R., Knight N., Dunbar RIM., 2009. Rowers’ high: behavioural synchrony is correlated with elevated pain thresholds. Biol. Lett. (2010) 6, 106–108 doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0670
  6. do Carmo EC, Barroso R, Renfree A, da Silva NR, Gil S, Tricoli V. Affective Feelings and Perceived Exertion During a 10-km Time Trial and Head-to-Head Running Race. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Feb 11:1-4. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0586. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32050163.

There are 8 comments

  1. lazarus

    Pacers are a blight on the sport. If pacers are employed it is not an individual sport, it is a team sport, and in any close competition the best pacer determines the winner.

    1. Corrine Malcolm

      Hi Lazarus. While I think there are definitely people in our sport who would agree with you, the “to have or not have a pacer” argument is purpose of this article. The psychological benefits a pacer might provide can also be achieved by running along side another competitor or a teammate, and that’s really what we are digging into here.

  2. Nicolas

    Interesting topic. Nice to see some scientific papers cited in reference.

    However studies on short and “fast” endurance events seem quite meaningless for ultrarunning, where for most non-elites, pacing usually happens at very slow paces of only a few mph, later in the race.
    Having run all my ultras solo, imho the main advantage of a pacer would be navigating with fresh brain and eyes, esp. on badly marked trails, deep into the night, after 30+ hrs without sleep, the only goal being not to make me faster, but rather avoid me a DNF by mitigating wrong turns, potentially getting lost and the following mental breakdown. You may classify this under “lightening the psychological load”, but really what it is is counterbalancing the lack of markers set by the RD (no RD can mark a 100-mile race in the mountains every 6 feet, let alone 200+ miles). That aspect is not present in distances up to 20-30m without night navigation and sleep deprivation. And that seems quite different than the psychology of not wanting to drop the pace in a short race, or that “coordinate collective action” you mention.

    And then there is a tough discussion to be had about muling. Whether you like it or not, let’s face it, many do it to some extent even when it is banned, be it for a gel, a sip of water, a routing app on a phone that still has battery (counts as muling to me: you mule the extra battery / power bank), or even the smallest thing like a salt tab, that weighs nothing but can still change the ending of a race.
    Maybe a topic for the next article…?

  3. Geezer runner

    Having never used a pacer in 30 years of trail ultras, I have more respct and admiration for those runners who can finish a tough trail 100 without a pacer than those that appear to require a pacer to make them feel better to finish. Soloists who do not use pacers or crews are a notch higher in my list – some races at one time were going to asterik soloists in the finish list. But the Leadville 100 allowing mules is disgusting. Yeah, the finisher technically did 100 miles, but… I remember my only LT100 19 years ago and how it felt when I was passed by a runner with a mule carrying all of his/her gear. Not one of my favorite memories of trail running.

  4. Nicolas

    In relation to this article, the other thing that bugs me regarding pacers is the incredible double standard that some runners have when it comes to acknowledging their help. According to this article and the general consensus among ultrarunners (solo and paced alike), having a pacer is a great help, physically, psychologically, logistically, you name it. And I’m not even talking about muling. However, when reading/listening/watching some race reports, the pacer is mentioned/showed as a mere footnote, if at all. Not only for mid-packers but for elites as well. You never see an ad with an elite ultrarunner having just won a major race mentioning pacers, or crew for that matter. It’s always “I” and never “we”.

    It feels like an alpinist bragging about summitting a peak while barely mentioning that he had 2 personal Sherpas along the way and a crew of 8 people massaging his feet at each base camp.

  5. Jim

    Having two racing categories, solo runners, and paced runners in races would be nice. It wouldn’t add much to the race logistic but does differentiate the two type of runners. LAVS does this sort of, Screwed vs. Crewed. And this year a Screwed runner set the fastest overall time!

  6. lazarus

    There is no comparison between a solo run and a paced run. If the pacer/runner team is competent the runner need only fix their eyes on the heels of the pacer and follow. Removing the requirement to focus is a bigger advantage than muling or any emotional boost. I do not believe that paced runners could duplicate the result if they were required to run the race on their own. A paced run has more in common with a relay than it does with a solo effort.
    I have been observing the abomination of paced ultras for decades now, and there is a body of evidence that indicates (barring a wide disparity in talent) the best pacer will determine the outcome of the race. The pacer should receive at least half the credit for the team effort.

  7. lazarus

    The Vol State does not differentiate between crewed and screwed runners. This is something the runners track themselves. There is only one set of results.

Post Your Thoughts