Best Trail Running Shoes of Outdoor Retailer Summer 2013

It’s the beginning of another August and that means it’s time for our roundup of the best new shoes of this summer’s Outdoor Retailer show, where companies highlighted their spring/summer 2014 offerings, which will generally debut in the first two months of next year. For the most part, this year’s show was full of incremental rather than revolutionary change.

Click on any of the following featured shoes to jump down to our preview of the model. If you don’t find what you’re looking for on this list, try searching this page as we provide abbreviated previews on a number of other models. We’ve also published a Facebook album with additional angles and models.

Hoka One One Conquest ($170 – January 1, 2014)

The Hoka One One Conquest is going to be one of those shoes that we have to run in before forming an opinion. Why? Because it looks ridiculous, BUT so did the original Hoka concept and it’s worked out well. So what’s going on with the Conquest? Two main things – Rmat and a truss system.

Rmat is a new midsole material proprietary to Deckers, Hoka’s new parent company. It’s an injectable natural rubber with high weight-to-resiliency properties resulting in greater midsole durabilty and an even more silent ride. The Rmat layer is overlaid with Hoka’s proprietary EVA to maintain the Hoka feel underfoot.

Unlike the traditional use of a truss in footwear, the Conquest’s truss isn’t there to add support. Rather, the truss is there to allow decoupling in the rear of the shoe upon heel strike. The truss and a deep foot frame in the heel make the Conquest look like it rides higher off the ground than it really does. The shoe incorporates water drainage ports.

Hoka One One Conquest

Hoka One One Conquest

Other updates from Hoka:

Rapa Nui 2 ($130 – January 1, 2014) – While the original Rapa Nui was never released in the US, the Rapa Nui 2 will make it over to the States in a limited release late this year before a full launch at the start of next year. The shoe has been updated with a no-sew upper that provides a more streamlined fit.

Bondi B 3 ($150 – January 1, 2014) – The third version of the Bondi B will keep the same midsole/outsole while the upper switches to a seam-free interior to the upper that’s more flexible, more breathable, and subject to high QA standards. The tongue will be thinner and lighter, while the midfoot has been snugged up a bit.

In addition, aside from the Kailua, all Hoka’s women’s models will switch to a women’s last with January 1 releases.

New Balance 110 v2 (Price TBD – July 2014)

Next year’s revision to the New Balance 110, the 110 v2, will offer a lot more underfoot and dumb down the 110 to the basics. There’ll be a full rockplate. There’ll be a full-coverage rubber outsole that’s a durable, sticky rubber. The upper won’t offer so many easy-tear perforations. The last will switch from the Minimus last to a 4-mm-drop version of NB’s PL last. It’s a last that allows for an insert. The midsole will be switched from Acteva Lite EVA to RevLite.

All of these changes make the shoe sound completely unrelated to the first version of the 110, but, from a wholistic perspective, it’s still a light, 4 mm drop, nimble trail running shoe.

New Balance 110 V2

New Balance 110 V2

Other additions and updates from New Balance:

00 v2 Trail ($109 – March 2014) – A radical departure from the original Minimus Zero Trail with a 7 mm lugged outsole based on the UK’s RX Terrain fell-running outsole. There’s a more significant toe rand and a synth suede-infused upper that’s reminiscent of the RX Terrain’s design. The Minimus last is again out with the PL4 last being tweaked down to zero drop. The rock plate’s extended into the midfoot. The result is a more protective, more trail-worthy shoe in a heavier (8.8-ounce) package.

007 (no, seriously) ($99 – April 2014) – A training shoe brought outdoors for bootcamps and mud runs. It’s got a gusseted tongue.

Patagonia EVERlong ($110 – November 15, 2013)

Patagonia Footwear made a radical leap when it released the minimalist EVERmore this year and it overshot what most of Patagonia’s own runners were looking for. With the forthcoming Patagonia EVERlong, 100-mile specialist Jeff Browning spearheaded development of a light, simple shoe that would excel where he does – very long runs in the mountains. Browning started with the idea that many runners toward the front of ultras these days are wearing road-racing shoes, showing that light shoes that run well are key, so you can bet that the EVERlong runs well on road stretches and hardpack trails. When things get technical, there’s a real midfoot wrap (but not over the lower metarsals) and a strategically placed toe bumper where you actually kick things – the front of your big and second toes. Padded heel pods help enhance foot lock down.

The EVERlong does have “minimalist features” such as a straight design in the arch and big toe as well as a 4 mm drop. Likewise, there’s no traditional heel counter. However, while the arch is straighter, it’s also not scooped out.

Patagonia EVERlong

Patagonia EVERlong

Salomon S-Lab Sense 3 Ultra SG ($160 – February 1, 2014)

Next year, Salomon is kicking another $20 off its pinnacle shoe line, the S-Lab Sense. Just as exciting is the introduction of a Softground version of the Sense in the Salomon S-Lab Sense 3 Ultra SG. Otherwise, the Sense remains the Sense. The only other notable update across both models is the addition of a finer outer mesh on the upper, thereby reducing the migration of grit through the upper.

Salomon S-Lab Sense 3 Ultra SG

Salomon S-Lab Sense 3 Ultra SG

Another update from Salomon:

Salomon S-Lab Sense 3 Ultra ($160 – February 1, 2014) – Essentially the blend of the S-Lab Sense 2 and Sense Ultra with a higher-durometer midsole than the original Sense, a compromised amount of lugged outsole area, and the Profeel film extending through the midfoot. As suggested above, the S-Lab Sense drops from $180 to $160 next year and features a less permeable (for dirt, not air) mesh upper.

La Sportiva Bushido ($125 – Late February/Early March 2014)

La Sportiva claims the Bushido is a racing/performance shoe, but I see many of iRunFar’s readers making the La Sportiva Bushido an everyday shoe that they might also where on race day. The 6-mm drop shoe swings back from the 4-mm drop of the Vertical K and weighs in at a now middle-of-the-road 9.8 ounces (278 grams). The primary story in the Bushido is the “STB Control” feature that moves the stabilization shank from underfoot to the sides of the shoe to allow for better underfoot feel. It’s got a rockplate, an airy mesh upper, and mix of Sportiva’s Friction Green and Friction Blue outsole rubbers with the stickier rubber in the middle of the outsole.

La Sportiva Bushido

La Sportiva Bushido

Altra Olympus ($130 – January 2014)

Altra’s message has always been cushioned zero drop. With the Altra Olympus, the company keeps the zero drop and adds even more cushion to a trail shoe a la Torin on the road side. Altra tested various midsole thicknesses and found that runners didn’t notice any difference in cushioning above the thickness they used in this shoe. The Olympus has a less aggressive outsole than the Lone Peak and features some exposed EVA for added traction on wet rock. This shoe is built on more of a stability last… it allows for neutral running, but compensates so the thick EVA doesn’t enhance medial collapse 150 miles into usage. There’s also a firm layer under the sock liner. The toe offers a steep taper for a pretty aggressive toe off. The Olympus’s last has more volume in the big and small toes and is a bit straighter overall. Although not shown in the photo, the production model will include a gaiter trap to go along with a gusseted tongue.

Altra Olympus

Altra Olympus

Other additions and updates from Altra:

Altra Superior 1.5 ($105 – January 2014) –  Like the Lone Peak last year, the Superior sees significant upper revisions on an unchanged underfoot package in the Altra Superior 1.5. The new version has an enhanced metatarsal wrap, a much tougher upper material, and the Lone Peak’s gaiter trap.

Altra Instinct/Intuition Everyday ($130 – January 2014) – Slick looking, cushioned, zero-drop casual shoes. Perfect for zero-drop fanatics as well as folks like me who like to casually wear low-drop shoes.

The North Face Ultra Trail ($110 – January 25, 2014)

The North Face Ultra Trail seemingly continues down the path blazed by the recently released Hayasa 2, in that it’s a low-riding, breathable trail runner with a decent run feel. The shoe includes TNF’s recently introduced Cradle Guide support system and extends the brand’s FlashDry technology throughout the entire upper for the first time to go along with a lightweight, breathable upper. The Vibram outsole consists of a tight array of tiny lugs that provide a great deal of ground contact and supplement cushioning. The 8.7 ounce (245 g) 8 mm drop shoe has 8 and 16 mm of midsole height in the forefoot and heel, respectively.

The North Face Ultra Trail

The North Face Ultra Trail

Another addition from The North Face:

The North Face Ultra Smooth ($110 – January 25, 2014) – Essentially the Ultra Trail for the road and smooth trails. The outsole and Vibram ground-contact EVA aim to provide a smoother ride for this 9.3 ounce (263 g) shoe.

Vasque Ultra SST (née Shapeshifter Ultra) ($170 – March 15, 2014)

The Vasque Ultra SST (née Shapeshifter Ultra) aims to conform to your foot and the terrain both through materials and geometry. Underfoot, there’s a slightly cupped midsole topped with 4 mm of foam rather than a strobel board and a traditional insole. The midsole material is used extensively in the structural elements of the shoe, including the toe rand, the heel counter, and even the metatarsal wrap up to the eyelets. The upper is a pull-on fit with a BOA lacing system. As for ground conformity, the extensive midsole in the shoe’s 22/28 mm stack heights (6 mm drop) enhances ground conformity along the same line as Hokas and La Sportiva’s Morphodynamic shoes, while the Shapeshifter’s individual pillars allow for more mechanical deformation. Like Hoka’s Conquest, this is one for which judgment will have to be left to the trails.

Vasque Shapeshifter Ultra

Vasque Shapeshifter Ultra

ASICS Fuji Racer 3 ($110 – November 1, 2013)

The 8.7 ounce ASICS Fuji Racer 3 features entirely new midsole/outsole tooling and a brand new upper in a 6 mm drop shoe. ASICS added ground contact to the outsole, spaced out the lugs for better mud shedding, and closed in the underfoot drainage holes. The Fuji Racer 3 retains its water-drainage feature by creating underfoot channels (that correspond to forefoot flex grooves) that drain out of the side of the midsoles.

ASICS Fuji Racer 3

ASICS Fuji Racer 3

Saucony Peregrine 4 ($110 – January 1, 2014)

From the looks of things, Saucony is making the Peregrine a franchise shoe. What else can you say when the Saucony Peregrine is the fourth generation of a yet-to-be-completely-revamped shoe. In that way, it reminds me of the Cascadia of the past half decade. In 2014, the Peregrine will get another millimeter of lug depth to go along with a more aggressive outsole pattern. On the other hand, the shoe’s rockplate has been thinned, which should lead to a more flexible forefoot. The midsole material goes from Progrid to Powergrid, while the upper sees a thinning of the Flexfilm overlays as the material continues to replace additional traditional overlays. The toe box should be more roomy thanks to a new upper pattern and the Flexfilm updates. The Peregrine remains a 4 mm drop shoe that will sit at 9.4 ounces.

Saucony Peregrine 4

Saucony Peregrine 4

SCARPA TRU ($109 – February 2014)

Following on the surprise success of the Spark, the SCARPA TRU is a trail racing shoe built with SCARPA’s concept of “mountain minimalism” – lightening things up, but still offering adequate protection and support – in mind. The result, a 8.5 ounce, mountain-worthy trail racing shoe.The TRU has a 6 mm drop and a very breathable upper.



Other additions from SCARPA:

SCARPA Ignite ($125 – February 2014) – Where the TRU brackets the Spark on the lighter side, the Ignite does so on the upper end. It’s a new take on a traditional trail runner that comes in at 10.2 ounces with a 8 mm drop (10/18 mm midsole heights) and a rock plate as well as a real outsole (4.5 mm lug depth).

SCARPA Ion ($120 – February 2014) – This appears to be a slightly more protective version of the Spark, with a 1.2 EVA rockplate rather than the Spark’s fabric rock protection. It’ll weigh 10.3 ounces.

Merrell AllOut Collection ($110-120 – February 2014)

Merrell’s AllOut collection is a good example of the pendulum swinging back to the center on drop. Neither Merrell nor the other companies that saw huge booms with 0 to 4 mm drop shoes are dropping those models, but they’re realizing that some consumers want and/or need more drop. Hence, the addition of the 6 mm AllOut collection. The Merrell AllOut Rush ($120) appears to be a traditional trail shoe at 10 ounces with 5 mm of lug depth… it’s just got a 6 mm drop. The Merrell AllOut Fuse is a 8 ounce, door-to-trail shoe with 2.5 mm lugs.

Merrell AllOut Rush

Merrell AllOut Rush

Brooks Cascadia 9 ($120 – February 1, 2014)

The eighth update to the classic Brooks Cascadia focuses on the upper with less sewing there. New flat laces reduce pressure points. Count on this one as a “don’t mess with a good thing” update. The latest version weighs in at 11.7 ounces for a US men’s 9.

Brooks Cascadia 9

Brooks Cascadia 9

Dynafit Pantera ($125 – Feb 15, 2014)

In talking with Henry Guzman of Boulder Running Company, who played a large part in the development of the Dynafit Pantera, the shoe fills the hole still empty from the departure of the Montrail Hardrock and is a shoe made for the “other 80%.” It’s a solid, protective, well-lugged shoe (that looks even luggier than it is) that’s snug in the midfoot and open in the toebox. The 8-mm drop Pantera weighs in at 12 ounces (340 grams).

Dynafit Pantera

Dynafit Pantera

Vibram Vybrid (Concept Stage)

Vibram’s currently test marketing a 14-mm-stack-height FiveFinger model, the Vibram Vybrid, at a Boston-area store. It’s currently in the concept stage, but worth noting in the context of other developments at this year’s summer OR show.

Other updates from Vibram:

Bikila EVO ($120 – February 2014) – The Bikila’s sole is increased from 7 to 8.5 mm and there’s a new antimicrobial upper.


While Montrail is introducing two new models next spring – the FluidFlex II ($90 – February 1, 2014) and FluidFeel II ($110 – February 1, 2014) – both are incremental tweaks to their predecessors. The FluidFlex II seems to be an update to the fit of the upper as well as providing additional medial structure. The biggest update on the FluidFeel II is aesthetic; however, the upper is now more breathable.

Montrail FluidFlex II

Montrail FluidFlex II

While the Bajada remains the Bajada, it may have seen the most meaningful changes in the Montrail line with Fluid Foam being added and the upper mesh being improved to reduce blowout issues.

Rogue Racer fans… stock up this season, the finale for this model.

There are 189 comments

  1. Todd

    It's kind of embarrassing but I buy all my running shoes on ebay for about a third of the retail price. In most cases, the shoes have hardly any detectable wear. Fit isn't an issue if you stick to brands that you know fit well.

  2. Ocram

    This reminds me of the cycling industry all over again, $$$ over passion. xeroshoes it is, $20. The simplicity and the minimalism away from mainstream and reconnecting with nature is what made me fall in love when I saw AK in his MT10's. 2014 line up is Justin Bieberesque rather the tools of the trade for one who enjoys the beauty of the trails and the thin air.

    1. Dom

      I've been in the 1400 for longer races. I think most runners adapt to new shoes: they break them in, learn their nuances, and grow to love them. I thought the 100 was great and the 101 had a stiff upper, but I ended up adapting to it and learning to love it.

      I too wish for a bigger specialty trail line from New Balance, and we've brought in the new trail 00v2 which is a whole new offering for fell mountain running. It's impossible to please 100% of the trail world that prides itself on being unique but we do our best. The 110v2 is due out December/January.

      1. Nick J

        Sounds great to me Dom. I'll be looking to get the new version, I think it looks great. Also as a expat Brit who dabbled with a bit of fell running I'm very interested in the RX Terrain inspired 00v2. The two shoes in tandem should work well for the majority of conditions.

  3. Pat W

    Got about 60 miles on mine including a 50K and a 22 mile long run and they still look brand new. Never ran in v1 because of the reputed build quality issues.

  4. Dom

    I agree, the 110v2 looks visually chunky, but in my opinion, the v2 is a suprisingly strong performer in technical rocky terrain. The revlite foam is lighter than it looks.

  5. GPR

    Thanks for the coverage, Bryon. Any updates with the Brooks Pure line, or will that be the same for the foreseeable future? I'm inclined to say they updated the line just last fall or winter, but I figured I'd ask…

  6. Mario Perez

    I really like the Go Run Ride for long runs in pavement and my favorite is the GoBionic but they have to work really hard on the Go Bionic Trail, I nearly destroyed the soles in one month of training and one mountain marathon.

  7. Sam Winebaum

    Ben Z and all, I spent time at Salomon and got an explain of the differences between the 3 Sense performance models: Sense 3, Sense Ultra (now a soft ground deep lug shoe), and new blue Sense Pro. The Pro is a 9.5oz, 16mm heel/ !0 mm toe $130 shoe. Same upper, albeit may be not the handmade quality of the other 2 Sense, Mantra style outsole My post on the Sense family here her e
    I think 6mm drop is the sweet spot, at least for me. I also have posts on the Hoka Conquest.

    1. Rich

      Is the Sense 3 somewhere then between the current Sense and Sense Ultra? The Sense Pro seems to fill the sqme function as the Mantra, given the same 6 mm drop (just a bit thinner midsole) and same sole, or are there significant differences?

      1. Sam Winebaum

        Rich it seemed to me that Sense 3 given deeper lugs all around and more ProFilm rock plate than the earlier Sense is closer to the current Sense Ultra. I forgot to include in my post but I also recall that the Sense 3 has a longer lasting midsole material than original Sense . I thought I heard it pretty clearly from Salomon that the Ultra is now a "softground" shoe (mud, snow, etc…) . They told me to help distinguish soft ground models from harder surface models all soft ground will have the black and red colors.

  8. Yup

    I’m told by the PI product line mgr that since PI introduced the EM line last fall, and the line has done so incredibly well, they are on a 2 year cycle for shoe changes, and those will just be minor updates and tweaks. In other words don’t mess with what works. Look for EM updates in 2015 and a couple of new Trail Sku’s as well. I did get a chance to put my foot in the new EM Zero though and it’s bad ass. So are the new Trail colors for 2014. And yea, it’s pretty much hard to beat the EM Trail line up. All 3 shoes are rock solid and the podium finishes in the line this and last year speak for themselves.

    1. Dan

      Would love to see an EM model with stickier outsole. The EM has been a favorite with one exception, the grip on rock is extremely poor. For that reason I do not use them on runs that involve much scrambling or rock hopping, which is unfortunate.

  9. Rich

    F-lites were running shoes before they were taken over by the cross-fit crowd. Great shoes to run in, just not durable uppers sadly.

    1. DavidJH


      Have you tried the new F-Lites (232,252,262) on the natural (wider) last? I've put my 262s through some pretty rough running for almost 250 miles so far (including 60-80 miles off trail and two different ultras) and they are holding up quite well. On regular clear trail, I'd venture to guess they are a 500 mile shoe…I'll probably get 300-350 out of mine, but like I said I've been abusive to them. They have a new tighter weave mesh than the older F-Lites that helps them hold up better. Best hardpack trail running flats out there IMO. That said, Inov-8 (if you are reading) a randed 252 or 262 mountain F-Lite wouldn't hurt my feelings ;)…

  10. Nick J

    Agreed, I'm not too bothered if it's the Trailroc, but I'm looking for a more "Randed" trail/mountain shoe on a 4mm drop or less platform. It's not possible at the moment, I had high hopes for the Roclite 243, but had to do some preemptive "freesoleing" (like shoe goo but better) on both the medial and lateral side in order to extend the rand where its needed. Tired of all my minimal trail shoes blowing in these spots – Mix master 2 and Peregrines by far the worst offenders…

    1. DavidJH

      Have you run in the Talon 212…can't see those blowing out too quickly and the 6mm drop, while I too wish it was 3mm, doesn't feel that high and isn't an issue to me.

      Also, I've seen a pic sent by a friend of a randed trailroc on what looks like the 245 platform with a more mountain style upper. I think Inov-8 will nail it eventually, they are slowly refining their lineup and have lots of great options already.

  11. Mike B.

    I need the width of the trailroc. The roclite looks to narrow. Maybe they will build it on the natural last at some point.

  12. william

    First, we get crowded trails and more prize money in competition the last few years, if that's not enough, we get all these road runners competing on the trails and now we have the nikenization of trail shoes, what's next?…

  13. Adam

    Bravo to PI to keeping it simple (their silly and confusing marketing talk of a "dynamic offset" aside) and not giving into the temptation to constantly produce manufactured novelties. I do wish they were priced <$100, but if they actually stand up to 500 hard miles, I can accept the price (I haven't reached that point with them yet).

    1. Yup

      Gladly the N0 I demo'd was priced at 100 flat, which is maybe a new trend in downward pricing. Their new line of running clothing is every bit as nice as they've ever had and about 20% cheaper then they've ever been, beating out out even TNF on the price point. Oh, and I have over 500miles on both my N2 and M2s, and that's even after running 4 100milers in the last 2 years between them both. Race in them, train in them, hike in them. Drink beer in them.

      1. Bro man

        New PI sticky rubber compound on a pair of tester N2 bottoms w N1 uppers just crossed the finish line 6th at Speedgoat. Though the Em trail runners have podium'd at tons of rocky technical scrablling slick rock races this past year. I live in the NW where it's always slick and wet out, and we do a ton of scrambling straight up mountain faces and I've never had any issues. Infact, I feel the shoes perform best in the tehcnical areas. way better then my Sportivas. Really, good strong form is more important then any sticky rubber though.

        1. Anonymous

          Love the shoe and find that the M2 is great in most technical situations. However, on steep rock and boulder hopping they simply lack the purchase of some other trail shoes (Vertical K, Cascadia, Ultra Raptor in my experience). This is also apparent in the lack of tread wear after 150 miles (definitely not complaining about the durability!) Look forward to the possibility of a stickier rubber compound on an EM model.

  14. KenZ

    That's what I said about the 101… my favorite shoe, ever. I returned my 110s.. hated them. Now I race 100s in my Gel Fuji Racers (which I hope weren't trashed with the update), but still daydream about the old 101s… It's hard to explain how much I loved tearing through the trails on those. I feel like my childhood was ripped away from me prematurely.

  15. Korey

    Yea, I loved the 101's, couldn't run in the 110's so I was super bummed. I hope this change brings back a little of what got lost in all those updates!

  16. Bro man

    New PI sticky rubber compound on a pair of tester N2 bottoms w N1 uppers just crossed the finish line 6th at Speedgoat. Though the Em trail runners have podium’d at tons of rocky technical scrablling slick rock races this past year. I live in the NW where it’s always slick and wet out, and we do a ton of scrambling straight up mountain faces and I’ve never had any issues. Infact, I feel the shoes perform best in the tehcnical areas. way better then my Sportivas. Really, good strong form is more important then any sticky rubber though.

  17. Stephen

    Not much discussion here about North Face's new offerings, but after trying almost everything in the Salomon range, I'm a huge fan of the North Face Ultra Guides. So I'm very excited about the North Face Ultra Trails shown here, which I understand Tim Olsen has helped develop. The vibram sole looks perfect for drier trails here in Australia. Bryon – any pictures of the Ultra Smooth???

  18. Dom

    If you find the new 110v2 too "cushioned" you can remove the insole and get right to the meat (as I did in the sample). It's a hard truth of minimalist shoes that less midsole=better fit but too little midsole=injuries. There's unique personal preferences that will make or break love for a shoe, but I think the 110v2 is an attempt to give runners a shoe they can train and race in, from 10-100 miles.

    Just a personal note, I race 10 mile trail races in the winter that are high intensity single track shredding events, and I'd pick the even for those short races.

    1. Nick J

      Dom, They sound perfect, I will be looking at getting hold of a pair. I felt that the MT110 were okay but had too many inherent problems – weak as hell uppers, lateral side build up and the grip was just not there – although quite a step up from the trail gloves I was using before. At the moment I've gone back to Inov8 and I'm rotating the 243 with the 295 (Roclite) If the NB comes in at a lower price point I just may shift over my allegiances again!

    2. andrew

      Hi Dom, I do get your point here but then as people have commented above, doesn't that sorta make it a different shoe? If something more protective is required, surely the 1010 is the answer. That's whats so cool about the current range of shoes. You can choose to wear the Mt00(V1) – MT110(V1) – MT1010 – MT1210 depending on what you are planning on doing in the same way that you can with Inov-8. I love the MT110(V1) because of where it fits into that equation – a trail shoe with a bit of protection that feels kinda like a racing flat. I just don't see the need to mess with that formula. Yes there were some issues that needed correcting but no need to reinvent the wheel IMO

  19. rms

    the mt1010v2 counts a 'minimus' right? I love the fit and feel of these shoes so much, but they did little to improve the durability of the vibram-pod sole: two pods delaminated on my 3rd run on rough terrain. It's not a quality control issue, but a design issue. Returned them for a refund and got the PI M2, which I don't especially like. They have a heavy, dead feel, and after 30 miles I still haven't figured out how to lock down the lacing in them without getting hot spots on the ball of the foot.

  20. rms

    As I said above, the pods started tearing off after 30miles, just as happened with my v1 pair, so I'm done with this line till v3. Others haven't had this problem: Gait and terrain differences, I guess. The upper looked great though.

  21. Scott

    lol the pictures of the vibram vybrid pretty much confirm that even vibram has abandon the whole "bare foot is better" fanaticism

    1. Sam Winebaum

      That vybrid might actually be a valid concept. I know Vibram is also working on maximalist mid sole constructions. Of course being the in the outsole business they are not a one trick pony.

        1. Scott

          well maybe not exactly a nike free…but basically it's a minimalist shoe at that point..which the whole five finger thing was supposed to be an "answer" too.

          I can't really bash them I've never tried them and likely never will so too each his own.

Post Your Thoughts